ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Language outcomes following long-term auditory processing training in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders: a retrospective case series.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this retrospective case series, the longitudinal trajectories of receptive language, expressive language, and vocabulary acquisition during auditory processing training (APT) were described for seven individuals with different neurodevelopmental characteristics. The study aims to highlight intra-case developmental patterns rather than to assess the intervention's effectiveness. Methods: Archived clinical records of seven participants with follow-up periods ranging from 24 to 48 months were reviewed. For all cases, the Preschool Language Scale-4 (PLS-4) scores at the baseline, 6-month, 12-month, 18-month, and 24-month observation windows were retained as unique age ranges corresponding to the highest item group in which all items were correctly completed at each assessment. Where a participant correctly completed all items in one age group but was unable to complete all items in the subsequent age group, their level was classified as the age group in which they had completed all items. Word counts reflect newly recorded words within each interval. The analyses were conducted on a case-by-case and descriptive basis; no inferential statistical tests were used. Results: By the twenty-fourth month, all seven cases had progressed to a higher PLS-4 item group age range compared with baseline, in terms of both receptive and expressive language. The number of newly recorded words in the shared observation window also increased at each stage. Whilst the median number of words recorded at baseline was 4 (range: 0-34), this figure was determined to be 678 (range: 133-1,150) for the 18-24-month period. Excluding initial words, the median total number of new words recorded between 0 and 24 months was 1,126 (range: 288-2,238). Individual developmental trajectories varied considerably. Conclusion: The data indicate that, over the follow-up period, there was progress and an increase in vocabulary acquisition in the age groups corresponding to the PLS-4 item groups at the case level. However, due to the small, clinically heterogeneous sample, the absence of a control group, and concurrent developmental and educational support, the observed changes cannot be causally attributed to APT. The findings are considered to be hypothesis-generating clinical observations for future controlled studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.