ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Convergence of need technology and culture driving the era of physical AI in medicine.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medicine is a predominantly physical profession, yet most medical artificial intelligence (AI) remains screen bound. Physical artificial intelligence (PAI) extends AI's capabilities and can directly address many of the healthcare system challenges and unmet needs such as workforce shortages, unsustainable healthcare costs, heightened expectations, aging population and need for pandemic preparedness. PAI relies on systems that autonomously perceive, decide, and actuate in real-time by synthesizing diverse environmental data from multiple sensory sources. These data undergo rapid processing and interpretation, facilitating immediate decision-making and responsive physical actions, including movement, object manipulation, and direct human interaction. This paper first identifies critical healthcare system needs that robotic agents can effectively address. It further examines core actions of PAI systems, emphasizing perceptual pathways, clinical decision-making processes, and human-robot interactions that translate sensory inputs into tailored, patient-specific responses. We explore essential data utilization aspects, including edge-device advances, PAI datasets, digital twins, and edge-to-cloud infrastructures that support real-time inference and are crucial for reducing barriers to PAI implementation. Finally, we analyze the cultural factors accelerating the adoption of PAI in healthcare and review PAI advancements in other sectors. We argue that the convergence of pressing healthcare demands, technological advancements, and cultural readiness signals a tipping point for PAI in medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.