ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Associations between household solid fuel use, kitchen ventilation, and depressive symptoms among older adults in China: a national cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Household solid fuel use has been associated with adverse mental health outcomes among older adults. However, evidence on the association between household solid fuel use and depressive symptoms, particularly with respect to kitchen ventilation conditions and potential geographic differences, remains limited. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 11,697 participants aged ≥65 years in the 2018 wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Household fuel types and kitchen ventilation conditions were ascertained through self-reported data. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10). Multivariable logistic regression models and multiple linear regression models were employed to estimate associations, adjusting for a range of potential confounders. Results: Among 11,697 participants, 3,143 (26.87%) exhibited depressive symptoms, and 3,471 (29.67%) reported household solid fuel use. After adjustment for potential confounders, household solid fuel use was associated with higher odds of depressive symptoms compared with clean fuel use (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.44). Similar results were observed when depressive symptoms were analyzed as a continuous CES-D-10 score (B = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.82). In exploratory analyses of specific fuel types, charcoal use showed a relatively higher odds estimate; however, this finding was based on a small number of exposed participants ( Conclusion: Household solid fuel use was associated with depressive symptoms among older adults, with joint exposure analyses further indicating differences across fuel use and kitchen ventilation combinations. These findings highlight the potential relevance of household energy and kitchen ventilation to mental health in later life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.