ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Toward a mixed-methods framework for evaluating digital health systems in low-resource settings: an infrastructure-aware perspective.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital health technologies have become integral to health system strengthening, yet their implementation in low-resource settings continues to face persistent challenges related to unreliable infrastructure, limited technical capacity, and constrained financial resources. Although existing digital health evaluation frameworks have advanced understanding of technology adoption, implementation, and sustainability, they frequently treat infrastructure as a contextual factor rather than a core determinant of digital health system performance. This Perspective argues that future evaluation should move beyond technology-centered assessment toward infrastructure-aware evaluation that explicitly recognizes the interdependencies among technical, infrastructural, operational, and economic dimensions. We propose an infrastructure-aware framework for evaluating digital health systems that integrates mixed-methods evaluation and builds upon established implementation science by recognizing infrastructure as a core evaluation domain alongside technical, operational, and economic considerations. The framework positions infrastructure, including energy reliability, internet connectivity, hardware availability, maintenance capacity, and technical support, as a central determinant of implementation feasibility and long-term sustainability. It is informed by implementation science, socio-technical systems thinking, and practical insights from digital health implementation in resource-constrained settings and is illustrated using the Bright Health program in Kenya and Ethiopia. By providing a structured, infrastructure-aware perspective, the proposed framework complements existing implementation science approaches and offers a more comprehensive basis for evaluating digital health systems in low-resource environments. Future research should operationalize the proposed domains, develop standardized evaluation indicators, and empirically validate the framework across diverse technologies and implementation contexts to support more resilient, equitable, and sustainable digital health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.