ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
An immune-inflammatory dysregulation score for risk stratification of 28-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP) is associated with high mortality and substantial heterogeneity in host immune responses among critically ill patients. Conventional prognostic scores primarily reflect comorbidity burden and organ dysfunction but do not directly capture immune dysregulation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 223 critically ill patients with SCAP admitted to the respiratory intensive care unit (RICU). Six prespecified immune-inflammatory biomarkers were evaluated as candidate predictors. The Immune-Inflammatory Dysregulation Score (IIDS) was developed using bootstrap-based stability selection (1,000 bootstrap resamples) followed by multivariable logistic regression. The discriminative performance of IIDS was compared with conventional clinical severity scores, and its incremental prognostic value was assessed using sequential prediction models. A final prediction model incorporating IIDS was internally evaluated using bootstrap optimism correction and presented as a nomogram. Results: IIDS comprised CD4 Conclusions: IIDS provided prognostic information complementary to conventional clinical predictors and improved apparent discrimination when incorporated into a sequential prediction model. Independent external validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.