Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745880›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Interest in patient navigation chatbots: a cross-sectional survey study.

A Luke MacNeill, Alison Luke, Shelley Doucet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Luke MacNeillCentre for Research in Integrated Care, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Alison LukeCentre for Research in Integrated Care, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.
Shelley DoucetCentre for Research in Integrated Care, University of New Brunswick, Saint John, NB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chatbots are accessible and cost-effective tools that may be able to provide navigation support to people who lack access to conventional patient navigation services. To date, little is known about people's interest in using chatbots for patient navigation. It is also unclear what specific types of support people would like to see incorporated into patient navigation chatbots. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into these topics. Methods: Participants were recruited through the Prolific research platform. They completed a cross-sectional survey that captured information on respondent characteristics, general interest in using a patient navigation chatbot, and interest in various navigation support functions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and ANOVA and hierarchical regression statistical tests. Results: A total of 276 participants (141 women; Discussion: The findings from this study will help inform the design and marketing of patient navigation chatbots. The effective implementation of this technology may fill some of the accessibility gaps that characterize conventional patient navigation programs.

Indexed as

accessbarrierschatbotsconversational agentshealth careinterestpatient navigationsurvey

Identifiers

PMID42745880
PMCPMC13574941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.