Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745875›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Case Report: Family-mediated prognostic non-disclosure and psychological deterioration in terminal cancer.

Pavithra Sankara Subramanian, Shrenik Ostwal

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pavithra Sankara SubramanianPsychology Department, CMR University, Bangalore, India.
Shrenik OstwalNMC Provita International Medical Center, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostic non-disclosure is a common practice in Indian palliative care, often driven by family members' intentions to protect patients from emotional distress. However, the psychological consequences of sustained non-disclosure remain insufficiently documented within psycho-oncology literature. This case report, structured according to the CARE guidelines, describes the psychological trajectory of a 34-year-old male police officer with metastatic gastric carcinoma whose terminal prognosis was withheld at his family's request. Initially, the patient remained hopeful following a total gastrectomy and chemotherapy. However, upon readmission with progressive multi-level intestinal obstruction, hepatic dysfunction, and sepsis, he developed escalating anxiety and distress. The growing discrepancy between his lived bodily experience and the "white lies" provided by his family contributed to significant psychological deterioration, culminating in an episode of self-harm (intentional cut injury over the neck and hand) and terminal decline. This case illustrates how well-intentioned family-mediated non-disclosure may inadvertently intensify psychological suffering by undermining trust, autonomy, and emotional regulation. The report underscores the importance of culturally sensitive yet psychologically informed communication practices, early psychosocial assessment, and structured family counseling within palliative oncology care to preserve patient dignity and psychological stability at the end of life.

Indexed as

case reportfamily dynamicsmental healthpalliative careprognostic non-disclosurepsychological distresspsycho-oncologyterminal cancer

Identifiers

PMID42745875
PMCPMC13574820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.