ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Leveraging machine learning algorithms to assess the impact of cervical cancer early detection on patients' survival.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer morbidity and mortality remain a significant global health challenge worldwide, with an age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) of 7.3/100,000 in 2022. Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs), especially sub-Saharan Africa, have the highest incidence and mortality of cervical cancer, with 70% to 90% of cervical cancer cases and deaths, respectively. Despite Rwanda's considerable efforts, cervical cancer remained the second most prevalent cancer among Rwandan women in 2023. Although numerous studies have explored the relationship between early detection and better outcomes, there is a lack of comprehensive research assessing the overall impact of early detection on patient survival in Rwanda. This study sought to explore the impact of early detection on survival outcomes, explore the use of machine learning (ML) techniques for survival prediction in cervical cancer patients, to provide a thorough understanding of the impact of cervical cancer early detection on patient survival. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Rwanda National Cancer Registry (2016-2023). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Log-rank Test, and Cox proportional hazards models were employed to evaluate survival rates and risk factors. Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression, and Survival Support Vector Machines (SSVM) models were developed, tested, and validated using 5-fold stratified cross-validation for survival prediction. Data cleaning retained 2,476 records with complete clinical information. Results: Early detection reduced the hazard of death by 39% compared to late detection. The Gradient Boosting ML Model demonstrated superior performance with an accuracy of 82.2%, sensitivity of 99.7%, and the lowest Brier score of 0.1408. 5-fold cross-validation confirmed model stability (AUC 0.550 ± 0.038 for Gradient Boosting. Key predictors of poor survival included older age at diagnosis and HIV positivity. Conclusion: Early detection significantly improves survival outcomes for cervical cancer patients. HIV positivity and age at diagnosis returned as key influencers for the survival outcome. ML models offer robust predictive capabilities, enabling resource optimization and personalized care in LMICs. Findings emphasize the importance of scaling early detection initiatives and leveraging ML for informed decision-making in cervical cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.