ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Leveraging wearables to safeguard workers in a hotter climate.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rises in global temperatures have threatened the health, safety, and productivity of workers who perform physically demanding work. Traditionally, occupational heat illness prevention plan have relied on environmental monitoring and administrative controls, however, these approaches do not account for the considerable intra- and inter-variability in physiological responses to extreme heat. In contrast, elite sport has served as a valuable test bed for investigating thermoregulation, exertional heat illness, and the feasibility of real-time physiological monitoring. Experiences from recent Olympic Games have demonstrated that integrated environmental and physiological monitoring systems can operate at scale under extreme heat conditions, while also highlighting important technological, operational, and governance limitations. Translating these advances to occupational settings presents both opportunities and challenges because workers differ substantially from athletes in age, health status, heat acclimatisation, work demands, exposure duration, and access to medical oversight. Furthermore, implementation is complicated by concerns regarding data governance, privacy, informed consent, device validity, interpretation of physiological information, and the use of physiological thresholds to guide workplace decisions. This commentary examines lessons learned from elite sport and discusses their application to occupational heatsafety programs. We propose a tiered adoption framework that aligns physiological monitoring complexity with organizational capacity, technical expertise, and governance requirements, ranging from foundational heat-safety practices to advanced multimodal physiological monitoring under professional oversight. Physiological monitoring should complement, but not replace, established heat-stress prevention strategies and be implemented within clearly defined operational and ethical boundaries. Future research should focus on validating wearable technologies in occupational environments, developing individualized decision frameworks, and establishing governance structures that support responsible implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.