ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Postoperative structured nursing plan for patients with cervical spine fracture and spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to examine the efficacy of structured nursing in promoting postoperative recovery among patients with cervical spine fracture and spinal cord injury. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis. A total of 100 patients with cervical spine fracture and spinal cord injury who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at our Hospital from December 2023 to December 2025 were included as the research subjects. They were divided into control group (Routine nursing, Results: After patient care to discharge from hospital, the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and VAS scores in the structured nursing group were significantly lower than those in the normal group; while the FMA, JOA scores were significantly higher than those in the normal group. After nursing, the psychological, social, physical and material function scores of patients in both groups were higher than those before nursing, and the structured nursing group was higher than those in the normal group. The overall incidence of complications during hospitalization in the structured nursing group was 13.33%, which was significantly lower than that in the Routine nursing group (38.18%). Patients receiving structured nursing had better clinical outcomes and higher nursing satisfaction relative to the normal group. Conclusion: Structured nursing can enhance the treatment outcome for patients with cervical spine fracture and spinal cord injury, alleviate pain and improve their negative emotions, and can also reduce the incidence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.