SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Incremental effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes and MASLD across Asian study settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We evaluated the incremental hepatic and metabolic effects of adding sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), or pioglitazone to comparable background glucose-lowering therapy in Asian adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through 30 June 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Eligible trials evaluated the addition of a study drug to background glucose-lowering management that was comparable between randomized groups and either remained stable or followed a prespecified adjustment protocol. Changes from baseline in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were coprimary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction, liver stiffness, fibrosis-4 index, fasting plasma glucose, lipid parameters, body mass index, serum adiponectin, and systolic blood pressure. Random-effects pairwise meta-analyses were performed, and GRADE certainty was assessed for the two coprimary outcomes. Safety outcomes were synthesized narratively because reporting was heterogeneous and frequently incomplete. Results: We included eleven randomized trials: 692 participants were randomized into eligible comparisons, of which 642 participated in the coprimary efficacy analyses. Moderate certainty was found for a reduction in ALT with the addition of an SGLT2 inhibitor compared with background therapy alone (mean difference [MD], - 7.56 U/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 11.24 to - 3.88); however, there was little or no clinically important further benefit observed for HbA1c (MD, - 0.09%; 95% CI, - 0.27 to 0.08; moderate certainty). Modest reductions in ALT were suggested by moderate certainty for GLP-1RAs (MD, - 6.71 U/L; 95% CI, - 11.53 to - 1.89) while low certainty indicated an HbA1c reduction (MD, - 0.48%; 95% CI, - 0.83 to - 0.14). Secondary exploratory findings favoring add-on therapy existed, although they are unadjusted for multiplicity. The comparative safety could not be assessed reliably. Conclusion: In short-term randomized trials conducted in Asian study settings, adding SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs may improve selected hepatic and metabolic surrogate outcomes. The available evidence does not support a treatment-class ranking, and the durability and clinical significance of these changes remain uncertain because follow-up was short and several comparisons were based on sparse evidence. Comparative safety also remains uncertain because adverse-event reporting was heterogeneous and incomplete. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420251231137.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.