SynthesisFrontiers in dental medicine2026
The effect of neuromuscular re-education and oral motor exercises on adaptation and masticatory performance in complete denture wearers- a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effect of neuromuscular re-education, oral motor exercises, or biofeedback compared to standard post-insertion care on objective masticatory function and patient-reported outcomes in completely edentulous adults receiving new conventional complete dentures. Methods: A pre-piloted search protocol was developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses - Protocol guidelines (PRSIMA-P) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251186130). A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across various databases. The selected studies were further evaluated using the Cochrane ROB 2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the ROBINS-I V2 tool for non-randomized studies. Results: The initial search yielded 1,517 records from which a final set of 3 articles (2 RCTs and 1 clinical trial) were included. Quality assessment indicated that one RCT had "some concerns," one RCT was "high risk," and the clinical trial was at "critical risk" of bias. A sensitivity analysis suggested that excluding the higher-risk studies did not alter the overall positive direction of the findings. The findings of the included studies indicated that oral motor exercises and biofeedback significantly improved the functional adaptation as well as patient satisfaction. Conclusion: The presented evidence suggests that active neuromuscular training is a cost-effective and feasible intervention to improve the functional adaptation to conventional complete dentures. Further high-quality research is recommended to substantiate these findings and to develop a protocol advocating for oral motor exercises and biofeedback to be included as a part of post-insertion instructions for conventional complete dentures. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO(CRD420251186130).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.