ReviewREC, interventional cardiology
Transcatheter treatment of aortic coarctation.
Review in REC, interventional cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic coarctation is a congenital disease that consists of the narrowing of the thoracic aorta, leading to distal blood flow obstruction. Significant aortic coarctation is associated with hypertension and distal hypoperfusion, with a poor prognosis without intervention. Initially, treatment was surgical; however, less invasive techniques such as percutaneous balloon angioplasty later emerged and proved effective in selected patients. The introduction of stent implantation significantly improved the outcomes, making percutaneous repair the preferred option, especially in adolescents and adults. However, immediate and long-term complications persist, which has driven research efforts aimed at improving the safety and efficacy profile. Modern strategies now focus on advanced stent designs, offering better delivery profiles and high redilatation potential. Gaps in knowledge remain, and data from studies with longer follow-up will be essential to further elucidate disease progression in these patients. This review aims to offer a comprehensive overview of these percutaneous procedures, discussing recent advancements, clinical outcomes, and future perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.