ArticleREC, interventional cardiology
DEB or DES for the treatment of calcified nodules after intravascular lithotripsy: the DEBSCAN-IVL trial design.
Article in REC, interventional cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06657833 (DEBSCAN-IVL. Drug Eluting Balloon or Drug Eluting Stent to Treat CAlcified Nodules After IntraVascular Lithotripsy.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DEBSCAN-IVL. Drug Eluting Balloon or Drug Eluting Stent to Treat CAlcified Nodules After IntraVascular Lithotripsy.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Calcified coronary nodules (CN) are among the most challenging lesions for percutaneous coronary intervention, as drug-eluting stents (DES) frequently result in suboptimal expansion, malapposition, and recurrent adverse events. Although intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) provides effective plaque modification, the optimal definitive strategy remains unclear. Drug-eluting balloons (DEB) have demonstrated potential in the treatment of complex lesions in which stent implantation may be less desirable. This trial aims to compare the safety and efficacy profile of DEB vs DES after IVL in patients with CN. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial. Results: A total of 128 patients with de novo CN confirmed by intracoronary imaging in vessels measuring 2.5 mm to 4.0 mm in diameter will be enrolled across 10 high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention centers. After lesion preparation with IVL, patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to receive a DEB or a DES. The co-primary endpoints are late lumen loss and net luminal gain at 9 ± 1 months of angiographic follow-up, both assessed by an independent core laboratory. Secondary endpoints include procedural, angiographic, and clinical outcomes, adjudicated by a blinded clinical events committee. Clinical follow-up will be conducted at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years. Conclusions: The DEBSCAN-IVL trial will provide the first randomized evidence comparing DEB and DES after IVL for CN.Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06657833.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.