ReviewJournal of minimally invasive surgery2026
Decision-centered artificial intelligence for perioperative care outside the operating room: a practical review for surgeons.
Review in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied across the spectrum of surgical care; however, most existing review articles have organized prior studies primarily by algorithmic type or predicted outcomes. Consequently, a structured understanding of "when" and "why" AI is integrated into real-world clinical workflows, and how its outputs inform surgical decisionmaking, remains insufficiently developed. Although both the preoperative and postoperative phases involve risk prediction, they differ fundamentally in their decision contexts, data characteristics, and modes of clinical application. This review sought to reorganize the surgical AI literature using a decision-centered framework. AI applications during the operation itself-including surgical video analysis, robotic automation, and real-time image guidance-are outside the scope of this review. Instead, this review focuses on AI that supports decision-making before and after surgery, emphasizing decision points relevant to minimally invasive surgical practice, including patient selection, treatment planning, surgical extent and approach planning, postoperative monitoring, discharge readiness, and surveillance planning. This review examined PubMed-indexed studies published between 2015 and 2025, analyzing the literature according to the clinical decision points each study was intended to support, rather than emphasizing comparative model performance. Among the studies reviewed, preoperative AI was predominantly applied to support patient selection and treatment planning in the context of diagnostic uncertainty. In contrast, postoperative AI was mainly used to support time-sensitive management and prognostic assessment. This review reframes surgical AI not as a standalone predictive instrument, but as an integral component of phase-specific clinical decision pathways across the surgical care continuum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.