ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2026
Development of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Short Duration HCV Treatment Response.
Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard durations of direct acting antivirals (DAAs; 8-12 weeks) can be a barrier to HCV treatment initiation and completion among marginalized populations. This study developed and internally validated a machine learning model to predict short-duration (4-6 weeks) DAA response using baseline clinical factors with potential to improve treatment uptake, cost-effectiveness and health system efficiency. Baseline data from several short-duration DAA clinical trials and treatment discontinuations from real-world cohort studies were used. Multiple machine learning models were evaluated. Nested cross-validation was employed to optimize model hyperparameters and assess performance. Clinical utility was evaluated using Area Under Receiver Operator Characteristics (AUROC), Area Under Precision Recall Curve (AUPRC) and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Threshold optimisation strategies were applied to balance model accuracy and DAA costs. Statistical analyses were conducted to estimate HCV RNA cutoffs predictive of treatment failure. Of 264 participants receiving short-duration DAAs (median 42 days; IQR 28-42), 94 (36%) experienced treatment failure. Predictors of failure included shorter durations, higher HCV RNA, higher AST-ALT ratio, genotype 3 and DAA class. The Elastic Net (regularized logistic regression) model demonstrated strong performance (AUROC: 83%; AUPRC: 73%). The Youden Index threshold balanced sensitivity (81%) and specificity (76%) with MCC of 0.56. A cost-optimized threshold, prioritizing retreatment minimization, achieved high sensitivity (98%) but reduced specificity (51%). HCV RNA cutoffs predictive of treatment failure were higher for protease+NS5A than NS5A + NS5B inhibitor regimens. Predictive models using baseline clinical data can identify individuals likely to respond to short-duration DAAs. Such models, if externally validated in larger and more diverse datasets, could facilitate HCV elimination efforts by improving treatment uptake, particularly for people who inject drugs, people experiencing homelessness or incarceration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.