ArticleCancer2026
Long-term patient-reported outcomes and toxicity following salvage radiotherapy for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Article in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSalvage radiotherapy (RT) after prostatectomy is common, but studies reporting long-term follow-up on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and toxicity are limited. The authors report the largest cohort of patients treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to date assessing patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and physician-rated toxicity with long-term follow-up.
methodsPROs were prospectively collected for men undergoing post-prostatectomy salvage IMRT. Declines in quality of life were defined using established minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds for bowel function (BF), sexual function (SF), urinary incontinence (UI), and urinary obstruction/irritation (UO) domains. Physician-reported genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were recorded with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0.
resultsBetween 2007 and 2019, 317 men were treated to a median dose of 68.4 Gy to the prostate bed with 72% receiving pelvic nodal treatment and 72% receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Median follow-up was 63 months. The median scores for UI, UO, BF, and SF did not decline more than the MCID at any time point except for the 6-week bowel score. At 5 years, the percentage of men with QOL decline exceeding MCID for BF, SF, UI, and UO domains were 23%, 25%, 29%, and 31%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of grade 3+ GU and GI toxicity at 5 years were 5.1% and 1.6%, respectively.
conclusionMedian patient-reported QOL scores remained largely stable following salvage RT after radical prostatectomy, although clinically meaningful declines occurred in a subset of patients. QOL decline and physician-rated toxicity were transient in approximately one-third of affected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.