ReviewClinical transplantation and research2026
Artificial intelligence in preclinical nonhuman primate xenotransplantation: bridging the gap from data complexity to clinical precision.
Review in Clinical transplantation and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonhuman primate (NHP) preclinical models remain an indispensable gateway for translating xenotransplantation into human clinical trials. These models generate high-dimensional immunological, physiological, behavioral, and histopathological datasets that are difficult to interpret with conventional analytical approaches and that limit the precision of translational inference. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) may help address this complexity: computer vision can support continuous noninvasive behavioral phenotyping and pain assessment; anomaly detection algorithms can extract early warning signals from biosignal streams; multiomics integration can identify xenograft-specific biomarker signatures; digital twin frameworks may enable hypothesis-generating simulations of prospective human recipient responses; and explainable AI (XAI) can make model outputs more transparent and regulatory defensible. This review synthesizes current evidence across these domains, highlights methodological limitations, and proposes a research agenda through which AI-augmented NHP experimentation can become a bridge from preclinical data complexity to clinical precision in xenotransplantation. The framework also supports the ethical mandate of the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), aligning scientific rigor with animal welfare imperatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.