ArticleJournal of neurochemistry2026
Bursting Parameters Alter Excitatory Postsynaptic Currents in Nucleus Tractus Solitarius Neurons: Implications for Clinical Vagus Nerve Stimulation.
Article in Journal of neurochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an approved therapy for multiple neurological and autonomic disorders; however, the mechanisms underlying its therapeutic effects and optimal stimulation parameters remain poorly understood. Vagal afferents activated by VNS terminate within the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), where sensory information is integrated and propagated throughout central autonomic networks. Although conventional VNS paradigms are used therapeutically, previous studies have demonstrated high rates of synaptic transmission failure within NTS circuits, suggesting that alternative stimulation strategies could enhance neural activity. Bursting VNS has emerged as a promising alternative to standard stimulation patterns, but its effects on NTS neuronal processing remain unclear. The present study used voltage-clamp recordings in rat brainstem slices to study NTS neurons, with solitary tract (ST) stimulation delivered using single-pulse or bursting parameters to evoke excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs). Bursting paradigms varying in frequency (150-350 Hz) and pulse number (2-4 pulses per burst) were compared with single-pulse stimulation. EPSC amplitude and total area under the curve (AUC) were used to quantify stimulation responses. In NTS neurons monosynaptically connected to ST afferents, bursting paradigms significantly reduced the amplitude of the first EPSC relative to single-pulse stimulation, whereas no differences in overall AUC were observed. In contrast, polysynaptic neurons exhibited burst-dependent differences in excitatory transmission, with differences observed relative to baseline and across pulse conditions. Specifically, AUC was significantly greater during lower-frequency (150-250 Hz) 3- and/or 4-pulse bursts compared with single-pulse stimulation. Across all frequencies tested, 3- and/or 4-pulse bursts also produced significantly greater AUC than the corresponding 2-pulse paradigm. These findings indicate that bursting stimulation differentially modulates excitatory transmission in monosynaptic and polysynaptic NTS neurons, with specific pulse and frequency combinations preferentially influencing higher-order NTS circuitry and providing insight into stimulation strategies that may improve central network engagement during clinical VNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.