ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026
Propagation Mechanisms of Security Risks in Public Data Circulation via Inter-Risk Dependencies: A DSM-Based Network Analysis.
Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Propagation Mechanisms of Security Risks in Public Data Circulation via Inter-Risk Dependencies: A DSM-Based Network Analysis.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid expansion of public data circulation has introduced complex, interdependent security risks that traditional, isolated governance approaches often fail to mitigate. Drawing on sociotechnical systems theory, systemic risk theory, and network theory, this study proposes a quantitative network analysis approach to identify, model, and evaluate the propagation of these systemic risks. By employing a methodological triangulation strategy integrating a systematic literature review, documented real-world incidents, structured expert consultation, and a survey of 102 field practitioners, we identified 12 core risk factors across the institutional, ethical, technological, and data domains. Using the design structure matrix (DSM) method, we constructed a directional dependency matrix to model the public data circulation security risk network. Topological analysis reveals clear structural differentiation and cross-domain transmission patterns. The institutional-data interface contains the largest combined number of links, while several other cross-domain interfaces also show substantial connectivity. Betweenness centrality analysis further identifies key nodes and structurally important transmission links, providing a structural basis for prioritizing subsequent intervention design and empirical evaluation. Overall, this study provides a systems-level understanding of how public data circulation security risks propagate and offers theoretical and methodological insights for improving data security governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.