ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Awareness and perceptions of artificial intelligence among pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons: a national survey.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI), a set of algorithms that mimic human intelligence, is increasingly being used in the healthcare field.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the awareness, expectations, and concerns of pulmonologists and thoracic surgeons regarding AI, as well as to assess their level of adaptation to these technologies.
methodsA 23-item online survey was administered to specialists and residents in the fields of pulmonology and thoracic surgery between January and May 2025. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all respondents. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0, with a p-value of < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
resultsAmong the 302 participants, 65.6% were pulmonologists and 34.4% were thoracic surgeons. A total of 85.4% believed that AI will be actively used in clinical practice, and 67.5% believed that AI would reduce the need for physician workforce. However, 59.3% considered AI less successful than physicians in diagnosis, and 65.6% in treatment. In addition, 86.8% emphasized the need for legal regulations, and 58.3% expressed concerns about data privacy.
conclusionsParticipants generally expressed a positive attitude toward AI, although they remained cautious due to ethical, legal, and technical concerns. Comprehensive regulations regarding education, legislation, and data security are needed to ensure the safe and effective integration of AI into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.