Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745322›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2026

The Influence of Different Types of Trust, Perceived Objectivity, and Perceived Risk on the Preferred Involvement of AI for Subjective and Objective Tasks.

Fabienne Michel, Michael Siegrist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fabienne MichelETH Zurich, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), Consumer Behavior, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3105-6747
Michael SiegristETH Zurich, Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), Consumer Behavior, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6139-7190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly involved in decision-making. While many consumers currently use AI for minor tasks such as music recommendations or for improving writing, it can also be used for more consequential decisions such as medical diagnoses or financial recommendations. A declaration of AI content is not common, and consumers may not always be aware that AI is involved in the decision-making. Therefore, it is important to understand their perception of AI for different tasks and how different kinds of trust influence the degree to which AI involvement is accepted. The psychometric paradigm was adapted to analyze participants' acceptance, perceived objectivity, and perceived risks in the event of errors for a list of different tasks. To analyze the role of trust, measures for general confidence, general trust, and social trust, as well as AI-trust and AI-distrust were collected. The online survey was completed by 923 Swiss participants. The results show that participants' preferred levels of AI involvement were influenced positively by the degree of subjectivity and negatively by the perceived risk associated with the task. Preferred AI involvement was highest for "Searching for information," "Making a weather forecast," and "Programming software" but lowest for "Delivering a court judgment," "Selecting a candidate for a job," and "Driving a car." General confidence, general trust, and social trust indirectly influenced acceptance of AI through AI-trust, but not AI-distrust. The findings indicate that although specific AI-trust has the largest influence on acceptance of AI, general types of trust are also important for evaluating AI in decision-making.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTrustAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPsychometricsRiskRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandAI acceptanceAI confidenceAI trustgeneral confidencegeneral trustpsychometric paradigmsocial trust

Identifiers

PMID42745322
PMCPMC13578579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.