ArticleBMC oral health2026
Radiopacity of contemporary flowable resin composites with different material formulations.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate and compare the radiopacity of contemporary flowable resin composites representing different material types using a digital radiographic system and aluminum-equivalent measurements.
methodsSix flowable resin composites, including universal injectable, bulk-fill, ormocer-based, and short-fiber-reinforced formulations, were investigated. Disc-shaped specimens (5 mm × 2 mm) were prepared and radiographed using a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) system together with a 21-step aluminum step wedge and tooth sections containing enamel and dentin. Mean gray values were measured using ImageJ software and converted to millimeter aluminum equivalent (mm Al) values. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test (α = 0.05).
resultsSignificant differences were observed among the tested composite materials (p < 0.001). GC G-ænial Universal Injectable exhibited the highest radiopacity (5.54 ± 0.09 mm Al), whereas Omnichroma Flow Bulk showed the lowest value (2.77 ± 0.09 mm Al). All tested composites exhibited mean radiopacity values above the dentin reference and met the minimum radiopacity requirement specified by ISO 4049.
conclusionsRadiopacity varied significantly among the tested flowable resin composites, demonstrating that materials with similar clinical indications may differ considerably in their radiographic visibility. These findings suggest that radiopacity should be considered alongside other material properties when selecting restorative materials, particularly in clinical situations where accurate radiographic interpretation during follow-up is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.