Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745303›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

Development of and satisfaction with a short-term outpatient preventive medical service for working informal caregivers: a study protocol of a non-randomized prospective pilot study.

Sophia Boesl, Anna Pendergrass, Elmar Graessel, Natascha Lauer, Annabèlle Mesloh, Elke Hüttenrauch, Antonia Keck, Johanna Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sophia BoeslSection of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. sophia.boesl@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6268-2568
Anna PendergrassSection of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Elmar GraesselCenter for Health Services Research in Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Natascha LauerSection of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Annabèlle MeslohTourismus Oberstdorf, Prinzregenten-Platz 1, Oberstdorf, 87561, Germany.
Elke Hüttenrauch, Oberstdorf, 87561, Germany.
Antonia Keck *Section of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Johanna Schmidt *Section of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Uniklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 80% of care receivers (CRs) in Germany are cared for at home by family members or friends. These informal caregivers (CGs) often report a high burden from caregiving, which negatively affects their mental and physical health and often results in reduced work hours. CGs with statutory health insurance can apply for preventive medical services. A change in the law has allowed the duration of service to be split. Recent research postulated specialized digital and analog multi-component interventions to protect CGs' health, which the pAKur project wants to develop and implement into public health. This pilot will focus on the development of and satisfaction with an outpatient preventive medical service for CGs.

methodsThe non-randomized, prospective pilot study will be performed on-site in Oberstdorf, Bavaria (Germany) and online from April 2026 to January 2027. Working CGs with a moderate CG burden caring for a CR with a moderate need for assistance will be included. The intervention will be developed in participation with CGs and experts in the corresponding field. Two groups (A and B) will participate in the same on-site treatment but will differ in the intensity of the digital support phase (A: low; B: high) and the location of the refresher treatment (A: on-site; B: digital). Within the framework of a mixed-methods design, quantitative and qualitative data will be collected: the main outcome will be CGs' satisfaction with the outpatient preventive medical service, assessed with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire and qualitative interviews. For secondary outcomes, several aspects of the CGs' mental and physical health will be assessed via questionnaires and qualitative interviews. Quantitative data will be analyzed descriptively and explored with MANOVA; qualitative data will be examined with content analysis. DISCUSSION: Potential issues regarding recruitment, organization, and dropout due to intervention duration will be addressed with financial incentives, support from the tourism board, and personal contact during the intervention. This pilot marks the first step in integrating the CGs' needs into existing preventive medical services as well as testing components and structures for future interventions.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trial Register (DRKS), ID:  DRKS00039025 ; 01/22/2026.

Indexed as

Caregiver burdenCaregiversPilot studyPreventive health programs

Identifiers

PMID42745303
PMCPMC13576231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.