Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745277›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2026

Artificial stone and silicosis: the Korean experience.

Jun-Pyo Myong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jun-Pyo MyongDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. dr_mjp@naver.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngineered stone (ES), also termed artificial stone, is a quartz-rich composite slab (typically 85-95% crystalline silica) used for kitchen and bathroom surfaces, and has driven a global resurgence of accelerated silicosis. Korea presents a distinctive context in which individual workers accumulated multi-era exposure across cementitious terrazzo (Dokkidashi), natural stone, polymer solid surface and high-quartz ES. We combine a narrative review of the Korean ES industry, respirable crystalline silica (RCS) exposure and clinical phenotype with a single-center case series.

methodsThis study reviewed Korean trade, employment, exposure-measurement, and adjudicated-case data, and conducted a retrospective case series at the Pneumoconiosis Clinic, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (index window 1-31 March 2026). Rapid-progression cases required radiographic pneumoconiosis plus progressive massive fibrosis (PMF)/complicated disease, a forced vital capacity (FVC) decline ≥ 150 mL/year, or accelerated disease at presentation, with ≥1 year of follow-up and serial spirometry.

resultsThe only ES-specific Korean exposure dataset (Institute of Occupation and Environment, C company, 2018) showed personal quartz of 0.045-0.179 mg/m

conclusionsES exposure was superimposed on decades of prior mixed silica exposure-a difference of degree rather than of kind from series reported elsewhere, possibly reflecting the shorter latency available to younger ES-only workers. Surveillance, exposure standards and compensation criteria should address multi-era exposure rather than ES alone.

Indexed as

Artificial stoneEngineered stoneRespirable crystalline silicaSilicosis

Identifiers

PMID42745277
PMCPMC13576292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.