ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Encounters between people with mental health and/or substance use problems and ambulance clinicians: a qualitative interview study in Norway.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInteractions between ambulance clinicians and people with mental health and/or substance use problems are frequent, and international studies show that these encounters are often shaped by stigma, power dynamics and challenges to patient autonomy. However, there is limited research exploring patients' experiences of ambulance services in the Norwegian context. This study addresses this knowledge gap.
methodsThis qualitative study was based on in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 23 people with mental health and/or substance use problems recruited from primary and specialized healthcare services and service user organizations. The data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, with input from a multidisciplinary stakeholder group throughout the research process.
resultsParticipants reported varied experiences in their encounters with ambulance clinicians. Prior interactions with other healthcare services strongly shaped their expectations of, and willingness to seek, emergency care. While some described professional and reassuring care, others experienced patronizing attitudes toward conditions perceived as self‑inflicted. Several participants also reported inadequate physical health assessments and treatment, and many felt excluded from decision‑making processes due to limited information, involvement, and respect. These experiences influenced their sense of safety, autonomy, and trust in emergency services.
conclusionsIn Norway, people with mental health and/or substance use problems described several challenges in their encounters with ambulance services, including stigma, patronizing attitudes, inadequate physical healthcare, and limited patient involvement. These findings highlight the need for improved competence in mental health and substance use and clearer communication practices to promote more equitable and respectful ambulance care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.