Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745255›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

External cervical resorption treatments in routine dental practice: a nationwide registry-based cohort study with long-term follow-up.

Fernando J Mota de Almeida, Jonas Norberg Cedering, ENDORECO Collaboration Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fernando J Mota de AlmeidaDepartment of Endodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Box 450, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden. fernando.mota.de.almeida@gu.se.ORCID 0000-0003-3388-9451
Jonas Norberg CederingPublic Dental Service Norrbotten, Tandvårdens Kompetenscentrum, Norrbotten County Council, Box 922, 971 28, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0004-9244-537X
ENDORECO Collaboration Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExternal cervical resorption (ECR) is a dental condition characterized by irreversible loss of tooth structure due to periodontal tissue activity, with varied treatment approaches. Evidence on outcomes mainly comes from retrospective studies in specialized settings with limited follow-up, whereas population-level real-world data are scarce. The Swedish National Dental Health Registry (SNDHR) provides a unique opportunity to examine treatment patterns and long-term outcomes of ECR at a national level. This study aimed to map treatment modalities used for teeth diagnosed with ECR in routine dental care and to assess tooth survival over extended periods, as well as to explore associations with available patient- and treatment-related factors within the constraints of registry data.

methodsData from the SNDHR between 2009 and 2018 were used to identify adult patients with ECR and associated treatments; only one affected tooth per patient was included, and wisdom teeth were excluded. Teeth receiving initial conservative treatment were followed longitudinally in the registry until extraction, emigration, death, or the end of follow-up in 2023. Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox regression models were applied to evaluate treatment patterns and factors associated with tooth survival.

resultsIn total, 14,881 teeth with ECR were identified (annual range: 1,132-2,071), of which 42.8% were extracted as the initial treatment and 57.2% received an initial conservative treatment (51.9% female; mean age 60.7 years, standard deviation [SD] 16.7; range 19-99), with or without surgery. The cumulative survival of conservatively treated teeth was 82.7% (standard error [SE] 0.4%) at 5 years, 74.9% (SE 0.5%) at 10 years, and 67.8% (SE 2.1%) at 15 years. In multivariate analyses, increasing age, fewer remaining teeth, molar involvement, and surgical treatment were associated with a higher risk of extraction, whereas root canal treatment performed within ±90 days of the initial treatment had no significant impact on tooth survival.

conclusionIn conclusion, this nationwide registry-based study provides population-level, long-term survival estimates for teeth affected by ECR and managed in routine dental practice. Although interpretation is limited by the lack of detailed clinical information inherent to registry data, the findings offer real-world evidence suggesting that teeth selected for conservative management demonstrate favourable long-term survival.

Indexed as

Root ResorptionTooth CervixAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSwedenYoung AdultExternal cervical resorptionOutcomes assessmentPrognosisRegistriesRoot resorptionsSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID42745255
PMCPMC13576311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.