Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745251›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

FAIR by design (TRACE): A Trusted Research Access & Collaboration Environment.

Marcel Müller, Benjamin P Geisler, Samar Shamas, Nikolaus V Bomhard, Eva Hoster, Markus Pfirrmann, Ulrich Mansmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcel MüllerInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Germany. mmueller@ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5276-5589
Benjamin P GeislerInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1704-6067
Samar ShamasInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3837-8055
Nikolaus V BomhardInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-5453
Eva HosterInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0749-1389
Markus PfirrmannInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8948-0690
Ulrich MansmannInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), LMU Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-8906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA tension exists between the open science imperative for data transparency through FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data sharing and the stringent requirements of current data protection regulations for health data. Researchers lack efficient yet affordable tools to share sensitive data responsibly. Existing solutions are often either difficult to use, expensive, or lack features like variable-level access control and auditable and reproducible workflows. Our objective was to develop a solution that lowers the threshold for researchers to share sensitive data responsibly and that can be operated by existing institutional staff.

resultsTRACE (Trusted Research Access & Collaboration Environment) was designed to support several data-sharing elements highlighted in the 2025 SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) and CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statements by providing controlled and auditable workflows and supporting reproducibility at the level of data and analysis code. Its features for data governance, sharing, reproducibility and security allow institutions to manage study data access and to establish consistent, transparent standard operating procedures through granular variable selection, integrated study visualisation, and provisioning into a sealed analysis environment. TRACE provides an automated workflow for selected data-access steps that had previously relied on manual curation and ad-hoc sharing. A core feature versions datasets together with the corresponding analysis scripts, supporting reproducibility at the level of data and code; the computational environment is not captured. TRACE has supported data governance across seven clinical studies and processed 56 data access applications. Across three studies, an uncontrolled before-and-after comparison found 42.4 manual interface exports per 30 days before TRACE and 4.7 after implementation; causality cannot be inferred.

conclusionsPlatforms like TRACE may help shift resource-intensive, expert-dependent data governance towards automated processes. Operated by existing institutional staff, TRACE may make controlled data sharing feasible for institutions with limited resources. By automating previously manual steps, TRACE is intended to reduce the administrative burden of governed data sharing; whether it shortens the interval from data request to analysis has not been measured. TRACE is used as a training environment for preparing and using data in sharing processes.

Indexed as

Access to InformationBiomedical ResearchInformation DisseminationComputer SecurityHumansData privacyData sharingFAIRInformation storage and retrievalOpen scienceReproducibility of resultsResearch integrityTRACETrusted research environment

Identifiers

PMID42745251
PMCPMC13576130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.