ArticleAnnals of African medicine2026
Low Vision Intervention in Individuals with Age-related Macular Degeneration.
Article in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of irreversible central vision loss in older adults. Low vision interventions (LVIs) aim to enhance residual visual function and promote independence. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of structured LVIs on visual performance, daily functioning, and quality of life in individuals with AMD.
methodsA prospective interventional study was conducted over 1 year at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Centre in Pune. Eighty-four participants with confirmed AMD and low vision were enrolled and assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postintervention. The rehabilitation program included optical, nonoptical, and electronic assistive devices, along with specialized visual training. Primary outcomes included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, and reading speed. Secondary outcomes were assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) and the modified Barthel index, evaluating self-reported visual function and independence in daily activities.
resultsOf the 84 participants, 78 completed the full follow-up. Statistically significant improvements were observed in BCVA (mean gain: 0.17 logMAR), reading speed (mean increase: 18.8 words/min), and contrast sensitivity (mean gain: 0.22 units). The NEI VFQ-25 composite score improved by an average of 17.3 points, with marked enhancement in near-vision tasks and social engagement. Functional ability, as measured by the Modified Barthel Index, also showed meaningful improvement. No device-related complications were reported, and more than 85% of participants adhered to their prescribed rehabilitation plans.
conclusionsStructured low vision rehabilitation leads to significant improvements in visual performance, functional independence, and perceived quality of life among patients with AMD. These findings support the integration of LVIs into standard ophthalmic care protocols for elderly individuals with low vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.