Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745158›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Context-informed personalized segmentation from radiology reports: A fully automated framework for long-term liver tumor follow-up.

Jaehee Chun, McKell Woodland, Austin Castelo, Caleb O'Connor, Mais Altaie, Aashish Gupta, Shanli Ding, Allyson Nguyen, Eugene J Koay, Kristy K Brock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaehee ChunDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9695-6079
McKell WoodlandDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0995-3695
Austin CasteloDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3015-3570
Caleb O'ConnorDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2871-6692
Mais AltaieDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9298-6644
Aashish GuptaDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-0921
Shanli DingDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3215-5555
Allyson NguyenDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2181-6423
Eugene J KoayDepartment of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7675-3461
Kristy K BrockDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9364-5040

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Project 3: Enhanced Sensitivity of Tumors to Proton Beam Therapy: Mechanisms and Biomarkers.P01CA261669 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TITT, UWE · 2021 to 2025
$14.0M
Project 3: InHANCE: Fibrosis Imaging Biomarkers of Radiation: An Orphan Drug Study to Evaluate REduction of SeVERity of Symptoms in a Randomized Evaluative Trial (FIBRO2SE-REVERSE)P01CA278716 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Kristy Brock · 2025 to 2026
$7.2M
Optimization and Evaluation of Anatomical Models of Liver Radiation ResponseR01CA221971 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BROCK, KRISTY · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Anatomical Modeling to Improve the Precision of Image Guided Liver AblationR01CA235564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BROCK, KRISTY, ODISIO, BRUNO C · 2019 to 2023
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA261669NCI NIH HHS P01 CA278716NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA221971NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235564NIH HHS P01CA261669NIH HHS P01CA278716NIH HHS P30CA016672NIH HHS R01CA221971NIH HHS R01CA235564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePersonalized segmentation has been shown to improve performance over generalized models in follow-up imaging; however, its robustness across large temporal gaps remains unclear. We propose a fully automated, context-informed personalization framework that integrates radiology report-derived clinical context with imaging features to improve longitudinal liver tumor segmentation.

methodsThis retrospective study included 171 patients for generalized model training and 41 longitudinal patients with follow-up CT scans acquired 3-15 months after baseline for personalization and evaluation. We developed a U-Net-based vision-language segmentation framework that automatically summarizes free-text radiology reports, encodes them into language embeddings, and integrates them into intermediate image features to provide clinical context. A generalized model was trained using paired CT-report data. For each longitudinal patient, personalization was performed at the 3-month follow-up using either image-only input (vision-only personalization) or paired image-report input (context-informed personalization). Models were then evaluated on subsequent 6-15-month follow-up scans without further adaptation. Patients were stratified into Stable and Dynamic cohorts based on relative GTV volume variability. Performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and LogPenalty Score (LPS), with additional ablation studies examining language models and report components.

resultsIn the Dynamic cohort, vision-only personalization exhibited diminishing gains at later follow-up, whereas context-informed personalization maintained statistically significant improvements in ΔLPS at 9-15 months (p < 0.05). In the Stable cohort, both personalization strategies showed sustained performance with comparable segmentation accuracy, indicating that incorporating report-derived clinical context did not degrade performance in cases with limited anatomical variability. Ablation studies demonstrated that domain-specific encoder-based language models (BioClinicalBERT) outperformed larger generative models and that effective context integration did not require complex architectural modifications.

conclusionIncorporating report-derived clinical context improves the longitudinal robustness of personalized liver tumor segmentation, particularly in patients with dynamic tumor evolution. These findings suggest that clinically grounded language representations can stabilize personalization across extended follow-up while enabling fully automated and scalable deployment.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLiver NeoplasmsPrecision MedicineTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutomationFollow-Up StudiesHumansRetrospective StudiesTime Factorsliver tumor segmentationlongitudinal follow‐up imagingpersonalized AIradiology report integrationvision‐language model

Identifiers

PMID42745158
PMCPMC13578125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.