ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Preserving the Educational Value of Off-Service and Cross-Disciplinary Experiences in Competency-Based Residency Training.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As residency programs continue to adapt educational structures to support specialty-specific outcomes and workplace-based assessments, some learning experiences that were traditionally mandatory, including off-service and cross-disciplinary rotations, have been modified to improve efficiency and alignment with specialty outcomes and competencies. However, changing such experiences without appropriately replacing the learning they afforded disconnects clinical learners from the broader educational value historically served by these experiences. In this paper, we describe the educational value of off-service and cross-disciplinary learning opportunities in postgraduate medical education. We argue that these experiences have historically contributed not only to discipline-specific competence, but also to broader forms of learning, including understanding how adjacent specialties organize care, developing familiarity across services, appreciating patient transitions across settings, and building collaborative approaches to clinical work. Using the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety framework as a conceptual lens, we propose that these educational experiences support physician development through interconnected learning processes that are not always easily represented within specialty-specific assessment structures. Rather than focusing on preserving prior rotation models, we invite clinicians and educators to consider how to preserve elements of off-service and cross-disciplinary rotations, which remain important for preparing clinical learners for practice.
Identifiers
42745151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.