ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2026
Inequities in Preventive Care for Adults with Intellectual and/or Developmental Disability in the USA: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A primary care physician cares for two female siblings in their 40s - one with Down syndrome, and one without. The sister without Down syndrome receives her Pap smears scheduled in accordance with national guidance. Meanwhile, this screening is repeatedly deferred for the sister with Down syndrome due to the assumption that she could not easily tolerate the exam. Concerned about her cervical cancer risk, the patient's sister takes her to a gynecological clinic that specializes in serving those with disabilities. Utilizing simple accommodations such as picture-based explanations and thoughtful anxiolytic administration, her sister was able to get her first Pap smear two decades later than recommended. The samples, fortunately, were negative for HPV and cervical dysplasia. This real-life example on the patient level demonstrates a problem widespread on the population level: the inequitable administration and uptake of preventive care in individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD). Studies have shown that these patients receive primary and secondary prevention methods such as vaccines and cancer screenings for breast, cervical, and colon cancer, at lower rates than the general population. Yet their need for this care is the same, if not higher -these patients are diagnosed at later stages and suffer higher mortality rates for these malignancies. In this narrative review, we examine disparities in preventive care utilization for US adults with IDD and describe barriers on the patient, clinician, and system levels. We then explore potential strategies to expand access, including alternative screening modalities and models of care delivery. Recognizing and addressing modifiable barriers to this care are essential to addressing preventable morbidity and mortality in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42745150What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.