Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745123›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Topological structure and the creation of visual complexity.

Ashna M Shah, Sami R Yousif

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashna M ShahDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sami R YousifDepartment of Psychology, Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. yousif.36@osu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What does it mean for something to be complex? Fundamentally, complexity is a cue that something is less easily represented by our minds. With this fact in view, complexity becomes a tool: By understanding the factors that lead to various impressions of complexity of a given object, we can effectively "reverse engineer" the underlying form of the mental representation of that object. Here, we use this tool to explore the ways that topological structure relates to perceived complexity - and, thus, whether, or in what way, topological structure may be part of the representation of objects. In two experiments, we give participants the opportunity to modify simple block-like objects in order to evaluate the topological features that are implicated in their sense of complexity. In a final experiment, using insights gleaned from the previous two, we test specific predictions about topological structure and visual complexity. Altogether, we show that topological structure is clearly implicated in judgments of complexity, including in some key ways that expand existing theories of visual complexity.

Indexed as

JudgmentPattern Recognition, VisualSpace PerceptionVisual PerceptionHumansYoung AdultComplexitySpatial cognitionTopology

Identifiers

PMID42745123
PMCPMC13578090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.