SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
Postoperative ctDNA-Guided Adjuvant Therapy in Resected Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prognostic Validity Versus Treatment-Decision Utility.
Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a strong marker of molecular residual disease after curative-intent colorectal cancer resection, but prognostic validity alone does not establish treatment-decision utility. We performed a PRISMA 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis with search coverage through March 31, 2026, separating randomized ctDNA-guided treatment-decision evidence from prospective prognostic cohorts, platform-trial evidence, implementation evidence, and ongoing trials. Thirty-eight reports or programs were included in the evidence map, and seven independent prospective cohorts contributed to the prognostic meta-analysis. Postoperative ctDNA positivity was associated with increased recurrence risk (pooled hazard ratio, 7.60; 95% CI, 4.70-12.31), with substantial heterogeneity (I²=80.6%) and a wide prediction interval (1.60-36.25). Decision evidence was scenario-specific: DYNAMIC supports consideration of selective stage II colon cancer de-escalation, whereas DYNAMIC-III did not establish non-inferiority for routine stage III de-escalation. Current evidence does not support routine empiric escalation for MRD-positive disease. Postoperative ctDNA should therefore be interpreted as a powerful risk-stratification tool whose treatment-changing role remains limited to selected clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42745098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.