ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
The specific nature of the statistical learning deficit in developmental dyslexia: Impaired temporal and spared spatial learning abilities.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While extensive research highlights the importance of statistical learning in language acquisition and processing, its relationship to developmental dyslexia, a common developmental language disorder, remains unclear. Studies of statistical learning in dyslexia often rely on specific tasks that most likely do not cover the scope of statistical learning as a multi-componential construct, making it difficult to discover what aspects of learning are affected in dyslexia. The present study provides the first systematic examination of two major facets of statistical learning in dyslexia. We investigated statistical learning performance among individuals with and without dyslexia using a 2 × 2 factorial design that systematically manipulated both the type of statistical relation between elements (non-spatial vs. spatial) and the structure of statistical input (conditional vs. distributional). Neurotypical participants demonstrated learning across all tasks, whereas individuals with dyslexia showed significantly reduced performance when statistical regularities involved non-spatial relations, though not when they involved spatial relations. This deficit was apparent regardless of whether tasks involved conditional or distributional statistics. The findings suggest that rather than being generally weak in statistical learning, individuals with dyslexia face challenges in learning environments involving non-spatial statistical regularities that require integration of statistical computations across multiple exposures. Given the involvement of non-spatial aspects in printed and spoken language, these deficits can add to the challenges faced by individuals with dyslexia in acquiring linguistic representations. Additionally, the dissociation observed in dyslexia supports the notion that statistical learning comprises distinct sub-processes rather than a single unitary process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.