ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Retrieval practice promotes semantic integration of real-world memories without compromising episodic integrity.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Actively recalling information is a well-established memory strengthening technique that reliably outperforms passive review. Termed "the testing effect," retrieval practice may promote semantic transformation and reshape related, unreviewed episodic information, beyond merely strengthening reviewed content. These broader effects of retrieval practice are difficult to capture with simplified laboratory materials but can be examined using rich, real-world events that evolve across multiple episodic and semantic dimensions. However, retrieval practice's impact on such real-world memories remains poorly understood. We therefore investigated how actively retrieving event details (retrieval practice) versus passively reviewing the same details (restudy) influenced memory for an episodically rich staged event after two weeks (n = 26 per group). Retrieval increased the incorporation of preexisting semantic information into recall narratives, with greater semantic integration after retrieval practice predicting more episodically rich narratives. These findings suggest that retrieval practice enhanced integration of event details with semantic knowledge, perhaps via co-activation of semantically related content during retrieval. We found tentative evidence of a testing effect for real-world events: Retrieval improved retention of tour details (so long as they were successfully retrieved during retrieval practice) but did not otherwise affect broader episodic memory for unreviewed content, narrative accuracy, narrative temporal and semantic organization, or subjective phenomenology. Together, these findings suggest that retrieval reshapes memories by integrating recalled content into semantic knowledge networks, while preserving the overall integrity of episodic representations. Our work reveals that the testing effect may be underpinned by distinct transformations of episodic and semantic memory, with semantic transformation enhancing rather than compromising episodic richness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42745090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.