Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745067›Full record

SynthesisCurrent environmental health reports2026

Toxic Air Contaminant Emissions from Residential and Commercial Fossil Gas Appliances: A Systematic Review.

Erika Tam, Jeremy K Domen, Drew R Michanowicz, Misbath Daouda

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current environmental health reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erika Tam *School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Jeremy K Domen *PSE Healthy Energy, Oakland, CA, USA.
Drew R MichanowiczPSE Healthy Energy, Oakland, CA, USA.
Misbath DaoudaSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. misbath.d@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2441-4227

Funding

California Air Resources Board 23STC022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewGas appliances are increasingly recognized as sources of indoor toxic air contaminant (TAC) exposure, yet no prior review has systematically synthesized emission factor (EF) data across appliance types and fuels. We reviewed the literature to characterize TAC emissions from residential and commercial gas appliances, identify data gaps, and assess implications for regulation and public health. RECENT

findingsTwenty-five studies met inclusion criteria. Evidence of nonzero emissions was identified for at least 41 TACs released through gas leakage and combustion pathways. Formaldehyde and benzene were the only compounds with sufficient data for quantitative characterization, with EFs varying by up to two orders of magnitude across studies and operating conditions. The literature was heavily concentrated on cooking stoves, while heaters, water heaters, and dryers were rarely studied. Emerging evidence suggests methane and carbon monoxide measurements may support inference-based estimation of leakage- and combustion-related TAC emissions. Gas appliances emit multiple carcinogenic and respiratory toxicants through both leakage and combustion. Expanded monitoring, standardized EF methodologies, and targeted measurement campaigns for understudied appliances are needed to support appliance standards, emissions inventories, and health-protective building decarbonization policies.

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorFossil FuelsNatural GasCookingEnvironmental MonitoringHumansAir PollutantsFossil FuelsNatural GasAppliance standardsEmission factorsGas appliancesToxic air contaminants

Identifiers

PMID42745067
PMCPMC13578121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.