Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745064›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026

Understanding the mechanistic interaction between DNA and polystyrene microplastic and the effect of microplastic on forensic DNA analysis.

Nitu Yadav, Safiyah Tehsin, Dyaneshwar Tanpure, Subhasish Sahoo, Arpita Aradhana Dash, Kajal Priyadarshini, Pragnya Priyadarshini, Hirak Ranjan Dash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nitu YadavSchool of Forensic Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Safiyah TehsinSchool of Forensic Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Dyaneshwar TanpureLloyd Institute of Forensic Science, Noida, India.
Subhasish SahooDNA Profiling Unit, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Arpita Aradhana DashDNA Profiling Unit, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Kajal PriyadarshiniDNA Profiling Unit, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Pragnya PriyadarshiniDNA Profiling Unit, State Forensic Science Laboratory, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Hirak Ranjan DashSchool of Forensic Sciences, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. hirakdash@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-6452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics contamination in the forensic biological samples and their possible detrimental effect on forensic DNA profiling is least explored. In-silico prediction showed more favourable interaction of polystyrene with Taq DNA polymerase (-4.57 kcal/mol) and the mtDNA HVI region (-1.98 kcal/mol). It showed a higher interaction with D8S1179 (-1.95 kcal/mol), followed by D13S317 (-1.93 kcal/mol), D21S11 (-1.89 kcal/mol), and D2S1338 (-1.53 kcal/mol) STR markers. ATR-FTIR analysis revealed the involvement of deoxyribose C-O stretching peak (1066 cm⁻¹ to 1047 cm⁻¹), phosphate asymmetric stretch (1242 cm⁻¹ to 1260 cm⁻¹), and purine ring C-N stretching (671 cm⁻¹ to 737 cm⁻¹) during the interaction of polystyrene with CT-DNA. 0.5 ng and 1.0 ng of control DNA were estimated as 0.027 ng and 0.046 ng respectively, in presence of 25 to 100 µg/ml polystyrene by RT-PCR. Treated sample IPC Ct value (27.72) did vary significantly compared to the control samples (27.83), suggesting fluorescence interference of polystyrene contributed to underestimation of DNA quantity. Spiking of 25 µg/ml of polystyrene adversely affected the amplification of D10S1248, TH01 and D12S391 markers. Peak height imbalance of the QS markers (0.44) suggested a significant PCR inhibition by 100 µg/ml of polystyrene MPs. All the tested concentrations of the MPs showed a significant detrimental effect on the quality of the DNA profiles. Such compromised profiles might complicate the analysis of LT-DNA samples and mixed profiles. Thus, the microplastics contamination in the forensic biological samples warrants immediate action and suitable mitigation strategies should be developed to increase the robustness of the routine forensic DNA workflow.

Indexed as

DNA profilingGenotypingIn-silicoMicroplasticsPCR inhibitorsPolystyrene

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.