ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Understanding the mechanistic interaction between DNA and polystyrene microplastic and the effect of microplastic on forensic DNA analysis.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics contamination in the forensic biological samples and their possible detrimental effect on forensic DNA profiling is least explored. In-silico prediction showed more favourable interaction of polystyrene with Taq DNA polymerase (-4.57 kcal/mol) and the mtDNA HVI region (-1.98 kcal/mol). It showed a higher interaction with D8S1179 (-1.95 kcal/mol), followed by D13S317 (-1.93 kcal/mol), D21S11 (-1.89 kcal/mol), and D2S1338 (-1.53 kcal/mol) STR markers. ATR-FTIR analysis revealed the involvement of deoxyribose C-O stretching peak (1066 cm⁻¹ to 1047 cm⁻¹), phosphate asymmetric stretch (1242 cm⁻¹ to 1260 cm⁻¹), and purine ring C-N stretching (671 cm⁻¹ to 737 cm⁻¹) during the interaction of polystyrene with CT-DNA. 0.5 ng and 1.0 ng of control DNA were estimated as 0.027 ng and 0.046 ng respectively, in presence of 25 to 100 µg/ml polystyrene by RT-PCR. Treated sample IPC Ct value (27.72) did vary significantly compared to the control samples (27.83), suggesting fluorescence interference of polystyrene contributed to underestimation of DNA quantity. Spiking of 25 µg/ml of polystyrene adversely affected the amplification of D10S1248, TH01 and D12S391 markers. Peak height imbalance of the QS markers (0.44) suggested a significant PCR inhibition by 100 µg/ml of polystyrene MPs. All the tested concentrations of the MPs showed a significant detrimental effect on the quality of the DNA profiles. Such compromised profiles might complicate the analysis of LT-DNA samples and mixed profiles. Thus, the microplastics contamination in the forensic biological samples warrants immediate action and suitable mitigation strategies should be developed to increase the robustness of the routine forensic DNA workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42745064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.