ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Lean-Agile Product Development in FDA Relevant and Regulated Medical Device Contexts.
Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis scoping review examines the implementation of Lean, Agile and hybrid Lean-Agile approaches in contexts relevant to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and regulated medical devices. The review assesses whether these approaches can facilitate faster development while ensuring the integrity of lifecycle evidence, regulatory compliance and safety. The focus is on digital QMS, documentation, validation, design controls, and critical adoption barriers and enablers.
methodsA PRISMA-ScR aligned scoping review from 2015 to 2025 searched major scientific databases and Google Scholar. Empirical studies reporting Lean, Agile, Lean Six Sigma, or hybrid implementations in FDA-relevant device contexts with key compliance outcomes were screened using predefined eligibility criteria.
resultsFrom 432 records, 13 empirical studies were included. Lean and Lean Six Sigma reduced defects and waste while improving traceability and audit readiness. Agile-inspired and Agile V-model approaches improved responsiveness and coordination when applied to design controls, verification, and risk gates. Digitalized validation and Lean 4.0 used real-time data and automation to match speed with evidence needs. However, adoption was limited by outdated systems, cultural resistance, and coordination gaps.
conclusionsThe evidence suggests that Lean-Agile approaches could facilitate accelerated development when integrated into a mature QMS infrastructure alongside digital traceability, validation-aware planning, regulatory governance and active quality. However, this evidence is still context-dependent, conditional and is limited by the predominance of single-site implementation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42745015What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.