Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42745007›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Complexity is a unified cognitive kind.

Tal Boger, Chaz Firestone

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tal BogerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. tboger1@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5476-8416
Chaz FirestoneDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. chaz@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1247-2422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Any information-processing system must deal with the complexity of its input. Yet, complexity arises in many forms: an image may be complex, a melody may be complex, and so too for linguistic or mathematical expressions. Are these disparate forms of complexity 'unified' in the mind, such that cognition represents a common quantity shared across qualitatively different types of information? Here we present 11 experiments (N = 1,500) that reveal domain-general representation of complexity. First, a reward-transfer task revealed that outcomes associated with complexity generalize across diverse stimulus classes, including shapes, dot arrays, melodies, letter strings, mathematical expressions and tactile forms. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that such transfer occurs automatically (intruding on task-irrelevant judgements) and underwrites individual differences in higher-level judgements across domains; for example, participants who find simple shapes aesthetically pleasing also find simple melodies pleasing. These results implicate a capacity for type-independent representation of information density, consistent with a shared representational language across cognitive domains.

Identifiers

PMID42745007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.