ArticleScientific reports2026
Searching for separation between frequency-modulated calls of blue and fin whales.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable differentiation of similar acoustic signals remains a major challenge for passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) of sympatric marine mammal species. Blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) produce frequency-modulated (FM) downsweeping calls with overlapping frequency ranges and durations, making species attribution difficult. This study combines long-term PAM datasets with animal-borne tag recordings to investigate how these FM calls can be reliably distinguished by species. Tag recordings with confirmed species identity showed substantial overlap in most acoustic features, but the parameter Duration 90% offered partial separation: with most fin whale FM calls < 0.6 s, and blue whale FM calls > 0.7 s. Applied to high-quality calls from moored data with signal-to-noise ratios above 12 dB, this approach may provide a conservative, rule-based means of classification. A more robust approach was achieved by combining deep learning feature extraction with non-linear dimensionality reduction. Integrating confirmed ground-truth tag recordings as a reference space enabled previously unseen FM calls from long-term PAM recordings to be attributed by acoustic similarity to known calls while maintaining an explicit measure of uncertainty by leaving acoustically ambiguous calls unassigned. Together, these approaches provide a practical framework for more reliable call attribution, enhancing long-term PAM-based monitoring of blue and fin whales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.