ArticleScientific reports2026
Cold-induced vasomotion changes in healthy individuals and patients after median or ulnar nerve repair.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This exploratory study investigated digital vasomotion during and after a standardized cold stress test in healthy subjects and patients previously treated for median or ulnar nerve injury. Twenty-five healthy individuals and 20 patients with a median or ulnar nerve injury were included. Finger perfusion was measured before and after a Cold Stress Test, using Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging. Vasomotion activity was quantified as the area under the curve of synchronized perfusion dips, and comparisons were made within and between the groups. Synchronized perfusion dips were observed in healthy participants both before and after cold provocation but were attenuated in patients with nerve injury. This suggests an impaired neural modulation of digital microvascular tone among nerve-injured patients. Among male patients with ulnar nerve injury, baseline perfusion was lower in the injured digit V than in the corresponding uninjured digit V (132 vs. 157 PU, p = 0.001), accompanied by reduced vasomotion activity (AUC 1.07 vs. 1.92, p = 0.010). In conclusion, neural mechanisms may be important in regulating vasomotion in the hand. Patients with a nerve trunk injury exhibit a different vasomotion pattern compared with healthy participants, supporting an important role of neural regulation in the alteration of digital vasomotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.