ReviewMolecular psychiatry2026
Is cold exposure a viable lifestyle intervention for mental health? Reviewing evidence and mechanisms.
Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cold exposure has gained substantial popularity as a wellness intervention, with growing public interest in its potential to alleviate symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress-related disorders. While early observational studies and anecdotal reports suggest mental health benefits, the empirical evidence remains limited and methodologically inconsistent. This review critically evaluates the current state of research on cold exposure and mental health, with a focus on three key physiological systems implicated in its proposed effects: the catecholamine system, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and immune-inflammatory pathways. We examine evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, and translational models, highlighting both promising findings-such as acute mood enhancement and stress modulation-and persistent uncertainties regarding mechanism and clinical relevance. Despite theoretical plausibility and preliminary support, existing studies are hindered by small sample sizes, heterogeneous protocols, lack of active placebo controls, and selection bias stemming from self-selected, health-motivated participants. Psychological improvements reported in several studies have not been consistently linked to objective biological changes. We conclude that cold exposure represents a promising, yet still unproven, adjunct for mood regulation. Future research should prioritize standardized protocols, active control conditions, and recruitment of clinical populations to clarify its therapeutic potential and underlying mechanisms.
Identifiers
42744977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.