ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Experiences and coping strategies of time toxicity in young and middle-aged patients with lymphoma: a descriptive qualitative study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith advancements in lymphoma treatment leading to improved survival rates, the time burden associated with cancer care has emerged as a significant concern. Time toxicity can disrupt daily life and impact treatment decisions; however, lymphoma-specific evidence regarding patients' subjective experiences remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the experiences of time toxicity and the coping strategies employed by young and middle-aged lymphoma patients in China.
methodsThis descriptive qualitative study took place from June to December 2025 in the haematology department of a tertiary hospital in Hangzhou, China. We employed purposive sampling with maximum variation to recruit patients aged 18-50 years who were undergoing lymphoma treatment. The study was informed by Time-Geography Theory. Data collection involved face-to-face semi-structured interviews, and the data were analysed using conventional content analysis.
resultsThe study involved fifteen participants, revealing five interconnected themes: (1) the multidimensional time burden driven by treatment; (2) the disruption of social roles and restructuring of daily life rhythms; (3) healthcare mobility constrained by time and space; (4) emotional distress associated with time toxicity; and (5) multilevel coping strategies for managing time toxicity. Time toxicity manifested not only as the cumulative time spent on healthcare activities but also as disruptions to daily routines, role functioning, healthcare mobility, and psychological well-being. Participants reported substantial time burdens due to frequent hospital visits, prolonged waiting times, and complex care pathways, particularly for those requiring cross-city care. Despite these challenges, patients employed various coping strategies, including active time management, Health-oriented self-management, cognitive adjustment, and family support.
conclusionsTime toxicity in young and middle-aged lymphoma patients is a multidimensional and contextually embedded experience shaped by the interaction between healthcare demands and everyday life. These findings highlight the importance of considering patients' temporal and spatial circumstances when coordinating lymphoma care and developing supportive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.