Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42744938›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of traps and rodenticide baits in field studies with house mice (Mus musculus).

Nicole Klemann, Stefan Endepols

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicole KlemannConsultant in Rodent Management, Warendorf, Germany.
Stefan EndepolsEnvu R&D, 40764, Langenfeld, Raiffeisenstraße 16, Germany. stefan.endepols@envu.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of trapping and subsequent rodenticide baiting for house mouse (Mus musculus) control under field conditions. Three field trials were conducted, with pre- and post-treatment feeding and tracking censuses used to estimate control success. Trapping alone reduced feeding census values by 69% from 159 to 49 g at Site 1, 40% (344 g/208 g) at Site 2, and 58% (194 g/82 g) at Site 3. Tracking censuses confirmed similar reductions (44-67%). Trapping was most effective in the lower infestation levels and where food availability was limited. The choice of lure strongly influenced performance: peanut butter consistently outperformed synthetic attractants. Subsequent brodifacoum baiting achieved 90-100% control of the remaining mouse populations across all sites. All trapped mice were found dead at daily checks; the majority were caught by the neck indicating generally swift kills, although some captures involved the chest or abdomen. Non-target captures were negligible. These findings demonstrate that while snap traps can substantially reduce mouse infestations, their success depends on infestation size, food availability, and bait type. Integrated use of rodenticide baiting remains necessary to achieve > 90% control under field conditions.

Indexed as

Rodent ControlRodenticides4-HydroxycoumarinsAnimalsFeeding BehaviorMice4-HydroxycoumarinsbromfenacoumRodenticidesAnticoagulant rodenticidesEfficacyHouse mouse controlMouse trapsMus musculusNoCheRoRodent management

Identifiers

PMID42744938
PMCPMC13578694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.