ArticleScientific reports2026
Socioeconomic disparities in survival among follicular lymphoma patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Within a universal healthcare system, the prognostic influence of socioeconomic status (SES) on survival in follicular lymphoma (FL) remains unclear. Thus, we conducted a nationwide, population-based analysis linking cancer registry data with regional SES indicators. Data from patients diagnosed with FL between 2013 and 2023 with mortality follow-up until the end of 2024 were obtained from the German Center for Cancer Registry and linked to the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation (GISD) at the district level, which comprises indicators of education, employment, and income. The primary endpoint was relative survival (RS) and secondary endpoint overall survival (OS), comparing patients from low-, middle-, and high-SES districts (categories based on official GISD quintiles). In total, 36 622 FL patients from 400 districts were included. At five years about 80% in female patients and about 77% in male patients were alive. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, females and males in high-SES districts had a 16% and 19% lower excess mortality risk than those in low-SES districts. Further adjustment for degree of urbanity, access to certified centers and a proxy for health-related lifestyle and comorbidities attenuated these differentials considerably. In this first study in a universal healthcare context, SES was an important determinant of survival among FL patients. Proxies for degree of urbanity, access to healthcare and comorbidity at the district-level appeared to account for a substantial part of these differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.