ArticleScientific reports2026
Structural behavior of HPC columns reinforced with CFRP bars under axial loading.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the axial compressive behavior of high-performance concrete (HPC) columns reinforced with carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) bars, motivated by CFRP's high strength, fatigue resistance, and corrosion immunity. Despite these advantages, limited research has constrained its practical use. Eight HPC columns (150 × 150 mm cross-section, 1200 mm height) made of M50-grade concrete with 8% silica fume and superplasticizer were tested under axial loading. Key parameters included axial load capacity, deformation, failure mode, and ductility. Results showed that CFRP-reinforced columns exhibited only a slight 5.7% reduction in ultimate load compared to steel-reinforced counterparts. However, CFRP specimens absorbed approximately 8% more energy while maintaining comparable ductility. No CFRP bar rupture occurred during testing; the maximum strain recorded in the longitudinal CFRP bars reached approximately 65% of their ultimate tensile strain capacity (2600 μm/m out of 4000 μm/m). Theoretical strength predictions using existing confined-concrete models aligned with experimental data. Overall, the study demonstrates that CFRP longitudinal bars and stirrups offer a viable alternative to conventional steel reinforcement in HPC columns. The minor reduction in load capacity is offset by improved energy absorption and environmental benefits, including corrosion resistance and potentially longer service life. These findings support broader application of CFRP in concrete structures, particularly where durability under aggressive conditions is critical. The work contributes valuable experimental data and validates analytical models, helping to bridge the knowledge gap hindering wider adoption of CFRP reinforcement in real-world construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.