ArticleScientific reports2026
Extrapancreatic extension exhibits tumor size-dependent prognostic impact in pancreatic cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal malignancy requiring precise prognostic stratification. Although extrapancreatic extension (EPE) was removed from the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system in favor of size-based classification, emerging evidence suggests EPE retains prognostic relevance. This population-based study analyzed 22,045 patients with surgically resected PDAC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2022) to evaluate EPE's prognostic significance and its interaction with tumor size. EPE was present in 78.0% of patients and independently predicted worse disease-specific survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.35). Notably, the prognostic impact of EPE varied nonlinearly with tumor size, exerting a stronger effect on smaller tumors. A modest but significant negative multiplicative interaction was identified (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.98), suggesting that patients with small EPE-positive tumors exhibited survival comparable to those with larger EPE-negative tumors. These findings were consistent across competing risk analyses. This study demonstrates that EPE remains an important prognostic factor in PDAC, with its effect modulated by tumor size. These results suggest that EPE assessment may warrant consideration in future postoperative staging and risk-stratification frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.