ArticleNature plants2026
Overcompensation of vegetation productivity after late-spring frost in the Northern Hemisphere.
Article in Nature plants, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Late-spring frost can disrupt plant growth, yet the extent to which vegetation recovers and compensates for frost-induced productivity loss remains poorly understood. Using eddy-covariance carbon flux data, satellite-derived gross primary productivity and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence across the Northern Hemisphere, and multi-year frost manipulative experiments, we show that overcompensation, in which post-frost recovery exceeds loss, occurs in 21.5-41.0% of events, with annual productivity exceeding the non-frost baseline. Overcompensation is strongest at high latitudes, reflecting reduced frost damage and greater post-frost regrowth. Manipulative frost experiments further confirm the overcompensation phenomenon in grasslands and reveal that both warmer temperatures and higher species diversity strengthen compensatory responses. Over the past two decades, productivity overcompensation has intensified as warming decreased frost-related losses and increased regrowth. Earth system model projections indicate that overcompensatory response will become increasingly common under future climate scenarios. Together, our findings reveal the occurrence of compensatory productivity gains after late-spring frost and clarify the climatic and ecological factors that shape their spatiotemporal patterns. Incorporating vegetation overcompensation into Earth system models will be essential for accurately assessing and predicting the impacts of climate extremes on terrestrial carbon cycling under global climate change.
Identifiers
42744870What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.