ArticleScientific reports2026
Validated stability indicating reverse phase liquid chromatography method for oxcarbazepine and its degradation products with greenness evaluation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oxcarbazepine is a widely prescribed anticonvulsant used in the management of epilepsy through modulation of abnormal neuronal excitability. The objective of the present study was to synthesize oxcarbazepine in the laboratory and develop a reliable, stability-indicating, and environmentally conscious reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for its quality assessment, including the quantification of impurities and degradation products. Oxcarbazepine was synthesized and characterized using infrared spectroscopy (IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) techniques. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a Supelco Discovery C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm) with a mobile phase consisting of 75% potassium phosphate monobasic buffer (pH 5.0) and 25% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Detection was performed at 257 nm, and oxcarbazepine exhibited a retention time of approximately 11 min. The developed RP-HPLC method was validated according to ICH, USP, and FDA guidelines. Forced degradation studies were conducted under acidic, basic, oxidative, thermal, and photolytic conditions to evaluate the stability-indicating capability of the method. In addition, the environmental impact of the analytical procedure was assessed using Green Analytical Chemistry (GAC) metrics, including the Analytical Eco-Scale, GAPI, and AGREE tools. The developed method demonstrated excellent specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, robustness, and sensitivity. All degradation products were well resolved from the parent oxcarbazepine peak, confirming the stability-indicating nature of the method. Excellent linearity was observed over the concentration range of 0.24-2000 ppm with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.9995. Accuracy values ranged from 99.4% to 101.5%, while the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.3 ppm and 0.9 ppm, respectively, indicating high sensitivity suitable for trace-level analysis. Robustness studies confirmed the reliability of the method under deliberate variations in chromatographic conditions. Furthermore, greenness assessment revealed an Analytical Eco-Scale score of approximately 75, a GAPI pictogram with predominantly green and yellow zones, and an AGREE score of 0.57/1.0, indicating moderate environmental friendliness. Overall, the validated RP-HPLC method provides a reliable, precise, sensitive, stability-indicating, and environmentally conscious analytical approach for routine quality control, impurity profiling, and stability studies of oxcarbazepine in raw materials and pharmaceutical formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.